---
id: "claim:science-should-be-machine-readable-2026-02-02-biorxiv:d1e5e7f07eb6471383c5"
kind: "claim"
title: "JATS decision letters, editor reports, and referee reports were classified as peer reviews, while author replies and com"
description: "JATS decision letters, editor reports, and referee reports were classified as peer reviews, while author replies and comments were classified as responses."
url: "https://sina.bio/claim/jats-decision-letters-editor-reports-and-referee-reports-were-classifie-69e1ca28"
---

# JATS decision letters, editor reports, and referee reports were classified as peer reviews, while author replies and com

JATS decision letters, editor reports, and referee reports were classified as peer reviews, while author replies and comments were classified as responses.

## Content

JATS decision letters, editor reports, and referee reports were classified as peer reviews, while author replies and comments were classified as responses.

## Metadata

```json
{
  "claim_position": 79,
  "source_publication_id": "version:science-should-be-machine-readable--2026-02-02-biorxiv",
  "source_work_id": "work:science-should-be-machine-readable"
}
```

## Connections (1)

### Science should be machine-readable

- ID: `version:science-should-be-machine-readable--2026-02-02-biorxiv`
- Kind: `publication`
- Direction: `incoming`
- URL: <https://sina.bio/publication/science-should-be-machine-readable>

This publication contains this grounded claim.

> We classified sub-articles by their JATS article-type attribute. Decision letters, editor reports, and referee reports became peer
> review files. Author replies, and comments became response files.

Source: 2026-02-02-biorxiv.pdf — <https://sina.bio/source/2026-02-02-biorxiv-pdf>